Re: [Harp-L] plag(i)arism

To: harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Harp-L] plag(i)arism
From: Vince Meghrouni <Foomcorp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 11:25:54 -0700
In-reply-to: <4689203F.8080203@aztecfreenet.org>
References: <200706290510.l5T5Abn5003773@harp-l.com> <000901c7ba6e$e54cc110$7564a8c0@GWBGS01> <46891522.7080601@charter.net> <001401c7bcbf$4997d090$7564a8c0@GWBGS01> <4689203F.8080203@aztecfreenet.org>

This is indeed a key point.

Ah the stormy winds a brewin' in the teapot...

Rex "Ya can't take it with ya" Tobago

On Jul 2, 2007, at 8:56 AM, fjm wrote:

I'm also noticing a lot of confusion regarding performance rights versus publishing and recording rights. Did the venue have an ASCAP decal? fjm

References:
- Re: [Harp-L] plag(i)arism
  - From: Rupert Oysler
- Re: [Harp-L] plag(i)arism
  - From: Glenn Weiser
- Re: [Harp-L] plag(i)arism
  - From: fjm

Previous by Date: Re: [Harp-L] plag(i)arism
Next by Date: [Harp-L] Billy Boy Arnold
Previous by Thread: Re: [Harp-L] plag(i)arism
Next by Thread: Re: [Harp-L] plag(i)arism
Harp-L July 2007 archives indexes sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
Harp-L list archive Table of Contents
More information about the Harp-L mailing list

This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.