Re: [Harp-L] Re: was experiment, now just combs




On Dec 21, 2008, at 5:23 PM, Jonathan Ross wrote:

So, yes, there may be nothing wrong with using the term "natural tone", but it's meaningless. It's even less meaningful than saying, "it gives the harp a better tone"--better than what? And in this case in particular, it begs the question of what is being sold and why--is this using false premises to sell a product? And if so, shouldn't that be pointed out to potential customers and possibly even the seller themselves? These may be excellent combs, but that is a separate question from how they are marketed. I fail to see how both are not valid areas of interest.





()() JR "Bulldogge" Ross () () `----'

So, in other words, to use your logic, anything that anyone posts on this site in the future that is remotely a mere 'commercial' and not proven, to the minutist degree, is to be disallowed and deemed out of order. I shall remember this, and I will apply it....in your name, of course.
In fact, I just thought of something. Anyone publisizing a future appearance at a future location will be disallowed because it can't be proven that such appearance actually DID occur.

smo-joe


_______________________________________________
Harp-L is sponsored by SPAH, http://www.spah.org
Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l




This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.