Re: [Harp-L] Re: TB or pucker - or a bit of both



Those that you mention really spent a lot of dedicated time to this  
endeavor. Most blues players won't.
 
The biggest mistake I hear from the level B players getting into OB is that  
they use, for example, 6 OB not so much to create an interesting line, but 
more  to show that they can do a 6 OB.
 
 
In a message dated 1/19/2009 8:16:33 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
bill.eborn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:

"It's  because the overblows are reedy thin in tone and approximate in  
pitch."

...only if you don't practice hard enough, one of things I  had to learn when 
I started using OBs was to restrain myself from  overusing the 6ob because I 
loved the sound of it so much and to try and  achieve a consistent tone no 
matter how you achieve the  note.

Howard Levy, Carlos Del Junco, Sebastien Charlier, I can't hear  much 
thinness and reediness there myself.....

Bill

-----  Original Message ----- 
From: "Drew W" <eviltweed@xxxxxxxxx>
To:  <harp-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 8:58  AM
Subject: [Harp-L] Re: TB or pucker - or a bit of both


>  Well I think it does, and Wilson thinks it does. On the other hand, I  just
> listened to Rick Estrin on that three-way chat say he thinks  there's no
> difference, though he also makes subtle adjustments in each  technique to
> mimic the other.
>
> But he also contradicts  that by saying something I totally agree with - 
> that
> you get  a sweet sound with a pucker and a sound that resonates through 
>  your
> whole body with a TB. So, he thinks there's a difference, but  also thinks
> there isn't. What are we to think if he can't  decide?
>
> What I think (and what I wrote) is that MOST of the  time you can tell when 
> a
> guy is puckering or TB-ing, but not  100% of the time. I think you get a
> deeper fatter sound when you  pucker the 2 draw than if you TB. I've heard
> guys do it both ways and  I'm yet to change my mind.
>
> As to your own experiments: we'll  never know because we weren't there and
> frankly I don't know how you  play and where your at or anything. What I do
> know is my Little  Walter, Kim Wilson, Big Walter, Steve Guyger and other 
> CDs
>  that I have listened to a million times... so I'll just keep working  that
> groove and trying to figure out why LW sounds like he did it this  way one
> time and that way another.
>
> Because it's fun.  Y'know?
>
> Anyway, this will never be something we can reach  consensus on. It's like
> overblowers wondering why the legendary blues  cats don't overblow. It's
> because the overblows are reedy thin in tone  and approximate in pitch. But
> you'll never convince their advocates  that that is true!
>
> (Ducks for cover)
>
>
>  It does? Funny, it doesn't when I play it. I think this gets to my
>>  point that often people make assumptions from their own playing  and
>> generalize it for when they listen to old records. Which is  a
>> natural thing to do.
>>
>  _______________________________________________
> Harp-L is sponsored by  SPAH, http://www.spah.org
> Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
>  http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l  

_______________________________________________
Harp-L is sponsored  by SPAH,  http://www.spah.org
Harp-L@xxxxxxxxxx
http://harp-l.org/mailman/listinfo/harp-l


**************A Good Credit Score is 700 or Above. See yours in just 2 easy 
steps! 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1215855013x1201028747/aol?redir=http://www.freecreditreport.com/pm/default.aspx?sc=668072%26hmpgID=62%26bcd=De
cemailfooterNO62)



This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail 0.09 (Mailman edition) and MHonArc 2.6.8.